2/01/2013

"Beware of what you dream. It could come true"

Title: Ruby Sparks 
Year: 2012 
Genre: Comedy, Fantastic, Romantic 
Director: Jonathan Dayton, Valerie Faris 
Writer: Zoe Kazan 
Runtime: 104min 
Cast: Paul Dano, Zoe Kazan, Chris Messina, Annette Bening, Antonio Banderas, Aasif Mandvi, Steve Coogan, Elliott Gould 

In Ruby Sparks, Calvin (Paul Dano) is a successful novelist suffering from creative block, until, sleeping, he dreams of an imaginary girl (Zoe Kazan), that not only inspires him, but also suddenly comes to life. 
By no means I intend to defend the Academy Awards. Not that I pretend to say that these are good or bad, because (business or non-business) supposedly it´s members have to reward, by voting, according to the subjective likes of each of one of them, and in that, I do not see anything wrong. Then, that what this people vote, is not, in fact, the absolute truth, is another matter. 
2006 was for independent Little Miss Sunshine, a positive year. It would be Oscar-nominated in four categories, keeping the best supporting actor and best writing. 
And I repeat, that the opinion of these people should not mean anything. However, personally, I still dare to recognize when they stand out, what has been, I think, a good writing. Deserved or not, the award, Michael Arndt's sceenplay was great. Something that would not happened again with the script of his successor, Zoe Kazan, working with the same directors. 
Ruby Sparks would take a different direction. Now with a young novelist, who, not even his therapist (Elliott Gould) would manage to help him enshape his ideas. Something for which he would have to resort to the dream world. 
A girl talks to Calvin. We do not understand much of what she says, but that does not matter, because Calvin wakes up on his couch, super inspired, and runs to his typewriter (some still prefer them, to computers), where he writes full speed. 
In another session, Calvin has trouble expressing Dr. Rosenthal, that, very weird thing, that is happening to him, until he finally does it. The thing is that, who has come to enlight him is a girl who does not even exist and for whom, for worse, he is falling. Calvin is able to describe Ruby, his new character, with clarity of details, both physically, in personality, or her biography. But most important is that writing is flowing back.
Until something strange happens. 
Ruby suddenly appear at his house, speaking to him (as if it were the most normal thing), to what Calvin goes crazy. 
A couple of situations that follow, one with his brother (Chris Messina), and another, with a fan, give to understand that his Ruby is as real as it seems. Along with Harry, he makes an experiment and discovers that everything that he writes of her, materializes. Something that is great, but crazy. 
Unfortunately, this good concept is quickly shot down by Kazan, who also plays Ruby. 
Calvin is soon, no longer astonished, to accept Ruby as the girl with whom he lives. From this, what we are shown is how the bond evolves, with its good and its bad moments, turning the film, to a large degree, into a typical juvenile drama on friction couple. Everything that, within the fantasy, could have been great, is lost, and almost everything that follows is a waste. 
Ruby Sparks comes to be about the conflicts between a girl who does not seem capable of behaving properly, and her jealous and possessive boyfriend, which adapts to a new girlfriend, as is things were just normal. 
With the problems between Ruby and Calvin, coming and going, Kazan takes too long to show us what we want more, which is, how a girl who came out of a sheet, written in ink, functions. So Kazan does not give to the magical aspect, it´s actual needed space. 
The handled premise is, that Calvin, to such point, is unable to talk to Ruby, that he opts to balance her with writing. Only in the last few minutes, is he taken to the extreme of possessiveness. When the differences between them have become too many, is that he solves to tell Ruby of the most extraordinary aspects of her existence. In a final scene, where Calvin becomes aggressive (though not in a verbal or physical way) uses his typewriter to drive her crazy, forcing her to do what he wants, just by typing in it. 
In conclusion, I think Kazan could have made of the magic power of the written word, the current element to be emphasized, and the movie would have gotten better. 
I can not, however, forget to mention of the excelent fate that Kazan gives to Ruby, when, for Calvin, it has come the time to say: enough! 

My rating: 3/10


Para acceder a la versión en español haga click aquí

1/29/2013

"New house, new family... old resources"

Title: Paranormal Activity 4
Year: 2012
Genre: Horror
Director: Henry Joost, Ariel Schulman 
Writer: Christopher B. Landon (written by), Chad Feehan (written by) and Oren Peli (characters) 
Runtime: 88min 
Cast: Kathryn Newton, Matt Shively, Katie Featherston, Allen Bradley, Aiden Lovekamp, Alexandra Lee, Stephen Dunham 
Produc.: Room 101 
Budget: $5 million approx. 

In Paranormal Activity 4, five years after the events of the second part, Katie and Hunter (now Robbie) have moved to another house. It will be their neighbors, across the street, who begin to sence a strange presence. 
The horror genre is the one that most suffers, and in an ugly way, because of the ambition of the producers.
If we thought of animation, with each new release, a viewer would hardly take the trouble of questioning it, either given their tendency to be better constructed, or because there is not so much prejudice here. 
Let us, then, go back to the other gender, and see what happens, in the same circumstances. It could be said that with this cinema, a same rule is, almost always, complied: if the first was successful, the formula has to be repeated until depleted. 
Precisely, Paranormal Activity 4 is an example of squeezing (lengthen) a franchise, until no longer made sense, but because the numbers achieved, satisfied. 
We first had Katie (Katie Featherston) and Micah, and their problems with demons. 
We then had, and not to repeat, Kristi and her husband. 
Worn out the present, then the past would be resorted. And the events during Katie and Kristi´s childhood. With a very low cost of production and over 200 million in revenues, it was to expect, that this would not be the closing. 
And here, the matter. Anyone who thought that three movies would have already exhausted all the options, certainly had not imagined the plan B. 
PA 2 (2010) ended with a possessed Katie, abducting Hunter, his infant nephew, to disappear, presumably forever. On that basis we are later surprised, in PA 4, with their return, in a new house, and in Hunter´s case, with a new identity: his name, Robbie. Aunt and nephew are now no more than puppets of an evil being, and their neighbors across the street, the perfect prey. So when Katie is suddenly taken by the emergency, these neighbors will be the only ones for Robbie, with whom to stay. 
The leading role in PA 4 passes to adolescents. This time Alex (Kathryn Newton), the eldest daughter of Holly (Alexandra Lee) and Doug (Stephen Dunham), and his friend Ben (Matt Shively) are those who feel that something is wrong. It also changes, in a way, the how we see what happens, as the whole film is seen from the webcams of this family. 
When one night, Ben's computer, in automatic recording (without him knowing it), saves what it registered by his friend´s camera, soon they have material to have fun with... or be scared. Because to see Robbie get into Alex's room while she sleeps, can not be less than disturbing. 
Wyatt (Aiden Lovekamp) and their visitor create a tenebrous bond, becoming the first, as strange as the second. Moreover, noises and things moving without human contact, are present in various parts of the house. As in the others, PA 4 also works a lot with the prolonged suspense, which precedes each event, but this time, without the same results. Attempts to scare us are in vain, because everything is now, very predictable. 
The idea of the relocated aunt and nephew is so contrived, that it is difficult to take it seriously. Above that, we see a child with another name, which makes no sense. 

My rating: 3/10


Para acceder a la versión en español haga click aquí